1. Home
  2. Guides
  3. Update on ATF’s Attempt to Ban 80% Frames and Receivers
Chris Fortenberry Jan 02 2023 2 min read

Update on ATF’s Attempt to Ban 80% Frames and Receivers

December 27, 2022

Breaking!!!  ATF has issued an open letter to FFLs to clarify their August 2022 ruling relating to frames, receivers, and 80% products.  ATF Press Release

On December 27, 2022 the ATF issued an open letter to Federal Firearms Licensees clarifying Final Rule 2021R-05F.  This rule is related to partially complete Polymer80, Lone World, and similar semiautomatic pistol frames.  The rule essentially required that 80% lowers be serialized because they are “firearms” and allowing them to be produced without serial numbers was leading to “ghost guns.”  Final Rule 2021R-05F went into effect on August 24, 2022.

Final Rule 2021R-05F attempted to define what a firearm was and was not, despite the ATF not having the constitutional authority to do so.  The Gun Control Act defined what is and is not a firearm and did not give the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives this regulatory authority.  Yet now, the ATF is trying to claim this authority for themselves.  This is another example of the executive branch usurping the legislative power of Congress.

After Final Rule 2021-05F went into effect in August, it became apparent that the rule only addressed the selling of complete kits and that companies could sell the 80% lowers without jigs, tools, equipment, instruction, or other materials needed to complete the 80% lowers.

According to the clarifying open letter issued on December 27, 2022, the ATF is now saying that even 80% lowers:

“have reached a stage of manufacture where they “may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted” to a functional frame.  This definition of “readily” applies to each and every classification of a partially complete frame or receiver under this Rule, whether sold alone or as part of a kit.  Therefore, even without any associated templates, jigs, molds, equipment, tools, instructions, guides, or marketing materials, these partially complete pistol frames are “frames” and also “firearms” as defined in the GCA and its implementing regulations, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3)(B) and 27 CFR 478.12(a)(1), (c).”

This is just another example of the unconstitutional assault on our second amendment rights coming from the ATF and Department of Justice. 

Chris is a firearms enthusiast and collector located in Texas. Chris’ passion for firearms started at a young age and was fueled by his passion for history. Chris used that passion to become a historian and feels that spreading the understanding of firearms functionally, socially, and politically is one of the paramount jobs of the 2nd Amendment community. He seeks to share his knowledge with those around him.

COMMENTS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore more

Ryan Domke Jan 25 2023 7 min read

Holosun SCS Review: The M&P and Glock Optics We’ve Been Waiting For?

Check out the tables below for the exact differences if you’re feeling like an overachiever. Without getting into the tenths of an inch difference in the dimensions, you’ll see that they are very close to the same optic. A few small areas ...

Ryan Domke Jan 25 2023 7 min read

Holosun SCS Review: The M&P and Glock Optics We’ve Been Waiting For?

Check out the tables below for the exact differences if you’re feeling like an overachiever. Without getting into the tenths of an inch difference in the dimensions, you’ll see that they are very close to the same optic. A few small areas ...